You stated the nature of each point correctly, but stated it without justification. This mark needs the reasoning shown — either evaluate the second derivative (d²y/dx² = 6x − 12, giving −6 at and +6 at ) or show a sign change of dy/dx either side of each point. An unsupported assertion earns nothing here even when the conclusion is right.
The three lines from d²y/dx² = 6x − 12 onwards are the whole difference. Your conclusion was already right — the examiner is paying for the justification, not the answer.