In simple terms
A friendly intro before the formal notes — no formulas yet.
Status of terms
9084 Contract — conditions, warranties, innominate terms, and remedies for breach.
- 1
By Statute: Parliament may specify that a term is a condition. For example, under the Sale of Goods Act 1979, s.12 (seller's right to sell) is a condition. However, statute can also moderate this; s.15A of the same Act states that for non-consumer contracts, if a breach of an implied condition (e.g., quality or fitness) is so slight that rejection would be unreasonable, it is treated as a breach of warranty.
- 2
By the Courts (Judicial Precedent): The courts may have already decided in previous cases that a particular type of term is a condition or warranty. For instance, obligations as to the time of performance in a commercial contract are often held to be conditions ('time is of the essence').
- 3
By the Parties: The parties may label a term as a 'condition'. This indicates their intention and is a strong factor, as seen in Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth, where timely payment was expressly made a condition. However, the courts are not bound by the label if it leads to an unreasonable result, as demonstrated in Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd, where the House of Lords treated a 'condition' as a warranty to avoid allowing termination for a trivial breach.
What this topic covers
The official Cambridge syllabus points this lesson works through.
- 3.2.3.1
Conditions, warranties, innominate terms – nature; effects of breach
Explore the concept
Use the live diagram and synced steps — play it or tap a step card to walk through.
At a glance — side by side
Compare key properties side by side — ideal for exam contrasts.
Comparison of Contractual Terms
| Feature | Condition | Warranty | Innominate Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | A major, vital term going to the root of the contract. | A minor, subsidiary term, collateral to the main purpose. | An intermediate term, not classified at the outset. |
| Effect of Breach | Destroys the fundamental basis of the agreement. | Does not defeat the main purpose of the contract. | Depends on the severity of the breach's consequences. |
| Remedy for Breach | Repudiation (termination) of the contract AND/OR damages. | Damages only. The contract must continue. | Repudiation if the breach is serious; damages only if it is not. |
| Guiding Principle | Is the term so important that its breach defeats the contract's purpose? | Is the term a lesser promise, not central to the contract? | Does the breach deprive the innocent party of substantially the whole benefit of the contract? |
| Key Case Law | Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876) | Bettini v Gye (1876) | Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (1962) |
Definition
Condition
Warranty
Innominate Term
Effect of Breach
Condition
Warranty
Innominate Term
Remedy for Breach
Condition
Warranty
Innominate Term
Guiding Principle
Condition
Warranty
Innominate Term
Key Case Law
Condition
Warranty
Innominate Term
Full topic notes
Formal explanation with the rigour you need for the exam.
The Classification of Contractual Terms
Not all terms within a contract carry the same weight. The law classifies terms based on their importance to distinguish between major and minor promises. This classification is crucial because it dictates the remedies available to the innocent party when a term is breached. The traditional categories are 'conditions' (the most important terms) and 'warranties' (lesser, subsidiary terms). A breach of a condition allows the contract to be repudiated, whereas a breach of warranty only gives rise to a claim for damages. Over time, the courts developed a third, more flexible category known as 'innominate' or 'intermediate' terms, where the remedy depends on the severity of the breach's consequences. Understanding this hierarchy is fundamental to analysing contractual disputes.
How Terms are Classified
The status of a term can be determined in three main ways:
By Statute: Parliament may specify that a term is a condition. For example, under the Sale of Goods Act 1979, s.12 (seller's right to sell) is a condition. However, statute can also moderate this; s.15A of the same Act states that for non-consumer contracts, if a breach of an implied condition (e.g., quality or fitness) is so slight that rejection would be unreasonable, it is treated as a breach of warranty.
By the Courts (Judicial Precedent): The courts may have already decided in previous cases that a particular type of term is a condition or warranty. For instance, obligations as to the time of performance in a commercial contract are often held to be conditions ('time is of the essence').
By the Parties: The parties may label a term as a 'condition'. This indicates their intention and is a strong factor, as seen in Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth, where timely payment was expressly made a condition. However, the courts are not bound by the label if it leads to an unreasonable result, as demonstrated in Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd, where the House of Lords treated a 'condition' as a warranty to avoid allowing termination for a trivial breach.
Conditions
A condition is a vital term of the contract, considered to go to its very root. Its performance is so fundamental that, if it is breached, the innocent party is deprived of the essential benefit they were supposed to receive. Consequently, the law provides the most extensive remedy: the right to repudiate the contract (i.e., treat it as ended) and claim damages for any losses incurred. The case of Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876) illustrates this principle. An opera singer's failure to appear on the opening night of a performance was deemed a breach of a condition, as her presence was crucial to the show's launch. This entitled the producers to terminate her contract.
A condition is a major term that goes to the 'root of the contract'.
Breach of a condition is a 'repudiatory breach'.
It allows the innocent party to choose between repudiating the contract and claiming damages, or affirming the contract and just claiming damages.
Key case: Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876).
Warranties
In contrast to a condition, a warranty is a minor, non-essential term that is subsidiary to the main purpose of the contract. While a breach of warranty is still a breach of contract, it does not undermine the core of the agreement. Therefore, the remedy is limited. The innocent party cannot repudiate the contract and must continue with their obligations, but they are entitled to sue for damages to compensate for the loss caused by the breach. In Bettini v Gye (1876), a singer was contracted to be available for rehearsals six days before the performance. He arrived only three days before. The court held this was a breach of warranty, not a condition, as it did not prevent the main performance. The producer was entitled to damages but not to terminate the contract.
A warranty is a minor, subsidiary term of the contract.
Breach of warranty only entitles the innocent party to claim damages.
The contract itself remains valid and enforceable by both parties.
Key case: Bettini v Gye (1876).
Innominate (or Intermediate) Terms
The rigid distinction between conditions and warranties can lead to injustice. The category of innominate terms provides a more flexible, 'wait and see' approach. Here, the term is not labelled as a condition or warranty from the outset. Instead, the court looks at the consequences of the breach to determine the remedy. If the breach is so serious that it deprives the innocent party of substantially the whole benefit of the contract, it will be treated as a breach of condition, allowing repudiation. If the consequences are minor, it is treated as a breach of warranty, with damages as the only remedy. This doctrine was established in Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (1962), where a ship's unseaworthiness was a breach, but the court decided the resulting delays were not serious enough to justify repudiation.
An innominate term is an intermediate term, neither a condition nor a warranty.
The remedy depends on the seriousness of the consequences of the breach.
The test is: does the breach deprive the innocent party of 'substantially the whole benefit' of the contract?
Key case: Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (1962).
In a problem question, first identify the breached term. Then, consider if it is labelled as a condition or warranty by the parties, statute, or precedent. If not, or if the classification is ambiguous, you must apply the Hong Kong Fir test for innominate terms. Analyse the effect of the breach on the innocent party to determine whether it is repudiatory. Using the phrase 'deprived of substantially the whole benefit' will show the examiner you understand the test.
Worked examples
See the formulas applied — reveal one step at a time, like the exam.
Shipowners charter a ship for 24 months. A term requires the ship to be 'in every way fitted for ordinary cargo service'. Engine breakdown causes 20 weeks of repairs in the first year. The charterers terminate the contract. The shipowners claim this termination was wrongful. Advise the shipowners.
- 1
1. Identify the Term and Breach: The term is the seaworthiness clause ('in every way fitted...'). The breach is the engine breakdown making the ship unseaworthy for 20 weeks.
A bakery, 'The Daily Bread', buys a new oven for £20,000 from 'ProBake Ltd'. The contract specifies the oven must be capable of baking 500 loaves per hour. On delivery, the oven only bakes 400 loaves per hour. The Daily Bread makes £0.50 profit per loaf and operates 8 hours a day. They want to reject the oven and terminate the contract. Advise The Daily Bread.
- 1
1. Identify the Term and Breach: The term is the oven's capacity of '500 loaves per hour'. This is an express term. The breach is the oven's failure to meet this specification, only producing 400 loaves per hour.
How it all connects
The big idea sits in the middle — tap a linked idea to explore the link.
Tap a linked idea to see how it connects back to the main topic — that connection is what examiners reward.
Glossary
Try to recall each definition before you reveal it.
Quick check
Answer in your head first — then tap to check. No pressure.
Revision flashcards
Flip the card. Test yourself before the exam.
Remedy for breach of condition?
Innocent party may terminate the contract (repudiate) and claim damages for any loss suffered. This is a repudiatory breach.
Key takeaways
Review these before you close the topic — retrieval beats re-reading.
- ✓
By Statute: Parliament may specify that a term is a condition. For example, under the Sale of Goods Act 1979, s.12 (seller's right to sell) is a condition. However, statute can also moderate this; s.15A of the same Act states that for non-consumer contracts, if a breach of an implied condition (e.g., quality or fitness) is so slight that rejection would be unreasonable, it is treated as a breach of warranty.
- ✓
By the Courts (Judicial Precedent): The courts may have already decided in previous cases that a particular type of term is a condition or warranty. For instance, obligations as to the time of performance in a commercial contract are often held to be conditions ('time is of the essence').
- ✓
By the Parties: The parties may label a term as a 'condition'. This indicates their intention and is a strong factor, as seen in Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth, where timely payment was expressly made a condition. However, the courts are not bound by the label if it leads to an unreasonable result, as demonstrated in Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd, where the House of Lords treated a 'condition' as a warranty to avoid allowing termination for a trivial breach.
Practice — then mark it
The whole point: a real Cambridge question, marked mark-by-mark.
Mark a status of terms question
Mark a status of terms question
Extra simulations & links
PhET, GeoGebra and other curated tools — open in a new tab.
Frequently asked
Checkpoint
One marked question is worth ten re-reads — close the loop before you move on.
Reading it isn’t knowing it — prove it.
Before you move on: do Mark a status of terms question on paper, snap a photo, and get examiner-style feedback on exactly where you win and lose marks.