In simple terms
A friendly intro before the formal notes — no formulas yet.
The core studies
9990 — Cambridge core studies, approaches, and issues and debates framework.
- 1
The 20 core studies are tools for understanding psychology, not just facts to be learned.
- 2
The syllabus framework is based on Approaches, Issues, and Debates.
- 3
Core studies provide the specific examples needed to discuss these abstract concepts.
- 4
Success requires moving beyond simple recall to analysis and evaluation using this framework.
Explore the concept
Use the live diagram and synced steps — play it or tap a step card to walk through.
At a glance — side by side
Compare key properties side by side — ideal for exam contrasts.
Distinguishing Between Issues and Debates in Psychology
| Feature | Issues | Debates |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | A specific point for evaluating a study's methodology, ethics, or implications. | A fundamental, ongoing argument about the nature of human behaviour and its causes. |
| Scope | Typically focused on a single study or piece of research. | Broad, spanning multiple studies, approaches, and areas of psychology. |
| Examples | Ethics, Validity, Reliability, Application to everyday life, Type of data. | Nature vs. Nurture, Free Will vs. Determinism, Reductionism vs. Holism. |
| Function in Evaluation | Used to assess the quality, credibility, and usefulness of a specific study. | Used to frame a study's findings within a larger theoretical conflict in psychology. |
Definition
Issues
Debates
Scope
Issues
Debates
Examples
Issues
Debates
Function in Evaluation
Issues
Debates
Full topic notes
Formal explanation with the rigour you need for the exam.
The Framework: Approaches, Issues, and Debates
The Cambridge A-Level Psychology course is built around 20 core studies. It is a common misconception to view these as 20 separate topics to be memorised. Instead, they are exemplars used to explore the entire landscape of psychology through a specific framework. This framework consists of three key pillars: Approaches, Issues, and Debates. The studies provide the concrete evidence and examples you will use to understand, compare, and evaluate these broader concepts. Your goal is not just to know what happened in each study, but to understand what each study tells us about a particular way of explaining behaviour (an approach), how to critique its quality (an issue), and where it fits into the grand arguments of psychology (a debate).
The 20 core studies are tools for understanding psychology, not just facts to be learned.
The syllabus framework is based on Approaches, Issues, and Debates.
Core studies provide the specific examples needed to discuss these abstract concepts.
Success requires moving beyond simple recall to analysis and evaluation using this framework.
The Five Psychological Approaches
An 'approach' is a perspective that involves certain assumptions about human behaviour. The syllabus organises the core studies under five key approaches, with four studies per approach. The Biological approach assumes behaviour is caused by physiological processes like genetics and brain activity. The Cognitive approach focuses on mental processes such as memory and thinking. The Learning approach posits that behaviour is acquired through experience, such as conditioning and observation. The Social approach examines how the social situation and the presence of others influence behaviour. Finally, the Clinical approach, introduced at A-Level, focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of abnormal behaviour. Each core study is a classic or key example of its designated approach, showcasing its theories and preferred research methods.
Biological Approach: Behaviour is rooted in physiology.
Cognitive Approach: Focuses on internal mental processes.
Learning Approach: Behaviour is learned from the environment.
Social Approach: The social context is key to understanding behaviour.
Clinical Approach: Concerns the study and treatment of mental health disorders.
Evaluating Research: Key Issues
Beyond understanding the approaches, you must be able to critically evaluate the core studies. This is done by considering several key 'issues'. A major issue is ethics: did the study protect participants from harm and respect their autonomy? Another is validity (is the study measuring what it claims to measure?) and reliability (is the study consistent and replicable?). You will also consider the nature of the data collected – quantitative (numerical) versus qualitative (descriptive). Furthermore, the issue of 'application to everyday life' asks you to consider the practical usefulness of the research findings. Every core study can be assessed against these issues, allowing you to identify its specific strengths and weaknesses, a crucial skill for examination success.
Issues are criteria used to evaluate the quality and implications of a psychological study.
Key issues include ethics, validity, reliability, and the type of data collected.
The 'application to everyday life' issue assesses the practical value of research.
Evaluating studies using these issues is a fundamental examination skill.
The Enduring Arguments: Debates in Psychology
Debates are fundamental, often philosophical, arguments that run through the heart of psychology. Unlike 'issues', which are used to evaluate a single study, 'debates' place a study within a wider theoretical conflict. The nature-nurture debate questions the relative contribution of genetics versus environment. The free will-determinism debate explores whether our behaviour is chosen or caused by preceding factors. The reductionism-holism debate considers whether it is better to break behaviour down into simple components or to view it as an indivisible whole. You will use the core studies as evidence to support one side of a debate, or to illustrate the complexity of the interaction between the two sides. For example, you might use a biological study to support the 'nature' side of the debate.
Debates are broad, ongoing arguments about the fundamental nature of human behaviour.
Key debates include nature vs. nurture, free will vs. determinism, and reductionism vs. holism.
Core studies are used as evidence to support or challenge different sides of a debate.
Understanding how studies relate to debates demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of psychology.
In Paper 2, Section B, you will be asked to discuss an issue or debate using the core studies as examples. Do not just describe the studies. You must explicitly link the aim, method, or findings of each study back to the specific issue or debate in the question to show the examiner you are answering the question directly.
Worked examples
See the formulas applied — reveal one step at a time, like the exam.
Describe Rosenhan's (1973) study of psychiatric diagnosis. Evaluate how this study relates to issues and debates in psychology. [10 marks]
- 1
AO1 — Rosenhan (1973):
- Aim: Test whether psychiatrists can distinguish sane from insane in clinical settings.
- Method: Eight pseudopatients (including Rosenhan) presented at 12 hospitals with a single complaint of hearing a voice saying "empty," "hollow," "thud." After admission, they behaved normally.
- Results: All admitted with schizophrenia diagnosis; average stay 19 days; normal behaviours reinterpreted as symptoms (e.g. note-taking labelled "writing behaviour"); no staff detected deception.
In Andrade's (2010) study on doodling, the doodling group recalled a mean of 7.5 items (names and places), while the control group recalled a mean of 5.8 items. Calculate the percentage increase in recall for the doodling group compared to the control group. Explain how this quantitative data supports the study's conclusion. [4 marks]
- 1
Step 1: State the formula for percentage increase. Percentage Increase = [ (New Value - Original Value) / Original Value ] * 100 In this context, the 'New Value' is the doodling group's mean score (7.5) and the 'Original Value' is the control group's mean score (5.8).
How it all connects
The big idea sits in the middle — tap a linked idea to explore the link.
Tap a linked idea to see how it connects back to the main topic — that connection is what examiners reward.
Glossary
Try to recall each definition before you reveal it.
Quick check
Answer in your head first — then tap to check. No pressure.
Revision flashcards
Flip the card. Test yourself before the exam.
Milgram (1963) — key finding?
65% of participants delivered maximum 450V shocks to a learner when ordered by an authority figure — obedience to legitimate authority.
Key takeaways
Review these before you close the topic — retrieval beats re-reading.
- ✓
The 20 core studies are tools for understanding psychology, not just facts to be learned.
- ✓
The syllabus framework is based on Approaches, Issues, and Debates.
- ✓
Core studies provide the specific examples needed to discuss these abstract concepts.
- ✓
Success requires moving beyond simple recall to analysis and evaluation using this framework.
Practice — then mark it
The whole point: a real Cambridge question, marked mark-by-mark.
Mark a core studies question
Mark a core studies question
Extra simulations & links
PhET, GeoGebra and other curated tools — open in a new tab.
Frequently asked
Checkpoint
One marked question is worth ten re-reads — close the loop before you move on.
Reading it isn’t knowing it — prove it.
Before you move on: do Mark a core studies question on paper, snap a photo, and get examiner-style feedback on exactly where you win and lose marks.