In simple terms
A friendly intro before the formal notes — no formulas yet.
Why one dollar of spending creates more than one dollar of income
An initial injection of spending does not stop when it is first received. Each recipient spends part of it, which becomes someone else's income, who spends part of that, and so on. Adding up every round, national income rises by a multiple of the original injection — that multiple is the multiplier.
Think of a single $100 note handed to a builder by the government. The builder keeps some and spends part of it at a café; the café owner spends part of that at a shop; the shopkeeper spends part again. The same money keeps changing hands, and every hand it passes through counts as new income. The total income created is far larger than the original $100 — but it is not infinite, because at each round some money leaks away into savings, taxes and imports.
- 1
An injection (government spending, investment or exports) enters the circular flow of income.
- 2
Households receive it as income and spend a fraction — the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) — while the rest leaks out as savings, taxes and imports.
- 3
That spending becomes another group's income, and the process repeats in ever-smaller rounds.
- 4
Summing all the rounds gives a final change in income equal to the injection multiplied by k = 1/(1 − MPC) = 1/MPW.
Explore the concept
Use the live diagram and synced steps — play it or tap a step card to walk through.
Key formulas
Tap any symbol to reveal exactly what it means and its units.
Full topic notes
Formal explanation with the rigour you need for the exam.
The core idea: an injection becomes rounds of income
The multiplier rests on a single insight: one person's spending is another person's income. When new spending is injected into the economy — say the government spends on building a hospital — the construction workers and suppliers receive it as income. They spend part of that income, which becomes income for shopkeepers and other firms, who spend part again. Each round is smaller than the last because some income leaks away, but adding up every round gives a final rise in national income that is a multiple of the original injection.
Injections are Investment (I), Government spending (G) and Exports (X) — spending that enters the circular flow.
Withdrawals (leakages) are Savings (S), Taxes (T) and Imports (M) — income that leaves the flow.
The multiplier is finite because withdrawals shrink each successive round of spending.
The larger the fraction re-spent (the MPC), the more rounds of meaningful spending occur, and the larger the multiplier.
The marginal propensities
A marginal propensity measures how a household splits an ADDITIONAL unit of income. There are four to know. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC = ΔC/ΔY) is the fraction spent on domestic goods and services. The marginal propensity to save (MPS = ΔS/ΔY), the marginal propensity to tax (MPT = ΔT/ΔY) and the marginal propensity to import (MPM = ΔM/ΔY) are the three ways income leaks out. Because every extra unit of income is either consumed domestically or withdrawn, the propensities always sum to one.
The marginal propensity to withdraw collects all three leakages into a single number: MPW = MPS + MPT + MPM. In the simplest model — a closed economy with no government — there is only one leakage, saving, so MPW = MPS and the identity reduces to the familiar MPC + MPS = 1.
The multiplier formula
The multiplier, k, tells you how many times larger the final change in income is than the injection that caused it. Because 1 − MPC and MPW are the same quantity (both equal the fraction that leaks away), the multiplier can be written in two equivalent forms.
Read the formula for its economics. A high MPC means people re-spend most of each extra unit, so 1 − MPC is small and k is large. Bigger leakages — a higher MPS, MPT or MPM — raise the denominator and shrink the multiplier. This is why an open economy with a government (three leakages) has a smaller multiplier than a simple closed economy (one leakage). Once you have k, the final change in real GDP is simply the injection scaled up by it.
The significance for fiscal policy
The multiplier is the reason fiscal policy can move the economy by more than its own headline cost. A government that increases spending or cuts taxes to close a recessionary (deflationary) gap injects demand that is then re-spent, so the final rise in real GDP exceeds the initial injection — a favourable multiplier makes expansionary fiscal policy more powerful. Knowing k also lets a government estimate the injection needed to reach a target level of income: to raise GDP by a desired amount, the required injection is that amount divided by k.
A larger multiplier makes any given change in G or T more effective at changing real GDP — useful when closing an output gap.
The multiplier works both ways: cutting spending in a downturn can contract income by more than the cut itself (the reverse multiplier).
The size of k depends on leakages, so economies with high MPS, MPT or MPM get less 'bang' from fiscal stimulus.
Real-world effects are dampened by time lags, inflation near full employment, and possible crowding out — so the actual change in real GDP is usually below the calculated figure.
Common mistakes examiners penalise
Using k = 1/(1 − MPW). The formula with MPW has NO 'one minus': it is k = 1/MPW. The '1 − ' belongs only with MPC, because 1 − MPC already equals MPW.
Forgetting to add all three leakages. MPW = MPS + MPT + MPM. Dropping the tax or import term gives too small a denominator and an inflated multiplier.
Confusing MPC with the multiplier. MPC is a propensity between 0 and 1; k = 1/(1 − MPC) is usually greater than 1. Reporting MPC as the answer, or multiplying the injection by MPC, loses the accuracy marks.
Multiplying by the wrong base. ΔY is the injection × k, not the whole level of GDP × k, and not the injection × MPC.
Omitting units, signs or working. Paper 3 awards method marks for shown working and accuracy marks for the correct figure WITH units ($m). A right number with no working, or the number without units, forfeits marks.
Assuming MPC + MPS = 1 in an open economy. That identity only holds in the simple closed model; once tax and imports exist, it is MPC + MPW = 1.
Worked examples
See the formulas applied — reveal one step at a time, like the exam.
In a closed economy with no government, MPC = 0.8. Investment rises by $30 million.
(a) Calculate the multiplier. (b) Calculate the final change in real GDP.
- 1
(a) Multiplier
An open economy with a government has MPS = 0.1, MPT = 0.2 and MPM = 0.2. Government spending increases by $60 million.
Calculate the final change in real GDP.
- 1
Step 1 — Marginal propensity to withdraw.
- MPW = MPS + MPT + MPM = 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.2 = 0.5.
Paper 3 (quantitative): In an economy the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75. Calculate the value of the Keynesian multiplier, and the final change in real GDP resulting from a $40 million increase in government spending. [4]
- 1
Model answer:
How it all connects
The big idea sits in the middle — tap a linked idea to explore the link.
Tap a linked idea to see how it connects back to the main topic — that connection is what examiners reward.
Glossary
Try to recall each definition before you reveal it.
Quick check
Answer in your head first — then tap to check. No pressure.
Revision flashcards
Flip the card. Test yourself before the exam.
Keynesian multiplier
The process by which an initial injection into the circular flow leads to a larger final change in national income, because spending in each round becomes income that is partly re-spent in the next.
Key takeaways
Review these before you close the topic — retrieval beats re-reading.
- ✓
Injections are Investment (I), Government spending (G) and Exports (X) — spending that enters the circular flow.
- ✓
Withdrawals (leakages) are Savings (S), Taxes (T) and Imports (M) — income that leaves the flow.
- ✓
The multiplier is finite because withdrawals shrink each successive round of spending.
- ✓
The larger the fraction re-spent (the MPC), the more rounds of meaningful spending occur, and the larger the multiplier.
Practice — then mark it
The whole point: a real Cambridge question, marked mark-by-mark.
Get a Paper 3 multiplier calculation marked: find k and the final change in real GDP, with method and accuracy scored
Get a Paper 3 multiplier calculation marked: find k and the final change in real GDP, with method and accuracy scored
Extra simulations & links
PhET, GeoGebra and other curated tools — open in a new tab.
Frequently asked
Checkpoint
One marked question is worth ten re-reads — close the loop before you move on.
Reading it isn’t knowing it — prove it.
Before you move on: do Get a Paper 3 multiplier calculation marked: find k and the final change in real GDP, with method and accuracy scored on paper, snap a photo, and get examiner-style feedback on exactly where you win and lose marks.