In simple terms
A friendly intro before the formal notes — no formulas yet.
The World's Stage: Who are the Main Players?
Global politics is like a massive, complex play with different types of actors. Understanding who they are—states, IGOs, and NGOs—and what they can do is key to understanding the plot of international relations.
Imagine your school is a 'state'. The headteacher and governors hold ultimate authority (sovereignty) within the school grounds. Now, imagine all the headteachers in the city form a 'City Schools Council' to agree on common rules for things like sports competitions or exam dates. This council is an 'IGO' – its members are the schools (states), and its authority comes from them. Finally, a student-led environmental club that campaigns for the school to recycle more is an 'NGO' – it's independent, focused on a specific issue, and tries to influence the school's policy without having formal power.
- 1
First, identify the actor in question: is it a state (like France), an IGO (like the UN), or an NGO (like Amnesty International)? Use their membership and funding sources as clues.
- 2
Next, analyse its sources of power. For a state, this is sovereignty, military, and economic might. For an IGO, it's the collective will of its member states. For an NGO, it's moral authority, expertise, and public support (soft power).
- 3
Then, consider the limitations of each actor. States are constrained by international law and interdependence. IGOs are often limited by state self-interest and lack of enforcement. NGOs lack formal power and can face funding or legitimacy issues.
- 4
Finally, synthesise these points to evaluate their relative influence in a specific global issue. For example, in climate change, how do the actions of the USA (state), the UNFCCC (IGO), and Greenpeace (NGO) interact and conflict?
Explore the concept
Use the live diagram and synced steps — play it or tap a step card to walk through.
Full topic notes
Formal explanation with the rigour you need for the exam.
The State: Still the Main Character?
The state remains the foundational unit of the international system. According to the 1933 Montevideo Convention, a state must possess a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. The defining characteristic of a state is sovereignty – the principle of ultimate authority within its territory. This gives states unique powers, such as the monopoly on the legitimate use of force, the ability to make laws, and the right to collect taxes.
Source of Power: Sovereignty is the key. It grants states legal equality in the international system (in theory) and control over their domestic affairs.
Hard Power: States are unique in their control of military forces and significant economic resources, which they can use to coerce or influence other actors.
Legitimacy: States possess a high degree of legitimacy, derived from international recognition and, in democratic states, the consent of the governed.
Challenges: Globalisation, economic interdependence, and the rise of non-state actors challenge state sovereignty. Issues like climate change, pandemics, and terrorism do not respect borders, forcing states to cooperate.
Intergovernmental Organisations (IGOs): The Rule-Makers and Referees
IGOs are created by states, through treaties, to address shared problems and facilitate cooperation. Their power is derived from their member states. We can distinguish between IGOs that are 'intergovernmental', where states retain full sovereignty (like the UN General Assembly), and those that are 'supranational', where states have pooled some of their sovereignty and delegated authority to a higher body (like the European Commission). Their influence depends on their mandate, membership, and the willingness of powerful states to abide by their rules.
Source of Power: Derived from their member states. Their authority rests on the treaties that created them.
Functions: Provide a forum for diplomacy, develop international law, coordinate action on global issues (e.g., WHO on health), and promote economic stability (e.g., IMF, World Bank).
Limitations: Often lack effective enforcement mechanisms ('all bark and no bite'). They can be paralysed by the competing interests of powerful member states (e.g., veto power in the UN Security Council).
Example of Influence: The World Trade Organisation (WTO) has significant power to authorise retaliatory tariffs when a member state violates trade rules, directly impacting state economies.
Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs): The Global Advocates
NGOs are independent, non-profit organisations that pursue objectives in the public interest. They are incredibly diverse, ranging from large, international advocacy groups like Human Rights Watch to small, local service-delivery charities. They do not possess formal power like states or IGOs, but they exert influence through other means.
Source of Power: Primarily soft power. This includes moral authority, expertise ('power of the pen'), information politics (naming and shaming), and mobilising public opinion.
Functions: Advocacy and lobbying, monitoring state and corporate behaviour, direct action and protest, and providing services where the state is unable or unwilling.
Limitations: Lack of formal power and enforcement capabilities. They can face issues with funding, accountability, and legitimacy. States can restrict their activities or ignore them.
Example of Influence: The International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), an NGO network, was instrumental in bringing about the 1997 Ottawa Treaty, demonstrating how NGOs can successfully lobby states to create new international law.
Worked examples
See the formulas applied — reveal one step at a time, like the exam.
Examine the claim that IGOs and NGOs have significantly diminished the power of the state in global politics.
- 1
A top-band answer requires a structured argument with clear judgement, supported by specific, contemporary examples. Here is a possible essay plan:
‘The power of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) is more symbolic than substantive.’ To what extent do you agree with this statement?
- 1
This question asks for an evaluation of the tangible impact of NGOs. A strong response will balance arguments for symbolic power against those for substantive power, using evidence.
How it all connects
The big idea sits in the middle — tap a linked idea to explore the link.
Tap a linked idea to see how it connects back to the main topic — that connection is what examiners reward.
Glossary
Try to recall each definition before you reveal it.
Quick check
Answer in your head first — then tap to check. No pressure.
Revision flashcards
Flip the card. Test yourself before the exam.
State
A political entity possessing a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. The primary actor in traditional realist theory.
Key takeaways
Review these before you close the topic — retrieval beats re-reading.
- ✓
Source of Power: Sovereignty is the key. It grants states legal equality in the international system (in theory) and control over their domestic affairs.
- ✓
Hard Power: States are unique in their control of military forces and significant economic resources, which they can use to coerce or influence other actors.
- ✓
Legitimacy: States possess a high degree of legitimacy, derived from international recognition and, in democratic states, the consent of the governed.
- ✓
Challenges: Globalisation, economic interdependence, and the rise of non-state actors challenge state sovereignty. Issues like climate change, pandemics, and terrorism do not respect borders, forcing states to cooperate.
Practice — then mark it
The whole point: a real Cambridge question, marked mark-by-mark.
Test your knowledge on Global Actors
Test your knowledge on Global Actors
Extra simulations & links
PhET, GeoGebra and other curated tools — open in a new tab.
Frequently asked
Checkpoint
One marked question is worth ten re-reads — close the loop before you move on.
Reading it isn’t knowing it — prove it.
Before you move on: do Test your knowledge on Global Actors on paper, snap a photo, and get examiner-style feedback on exactly where you win and lose marks.