In simple terms
A friendly intro before the formal notes — no formulas yet.
Three Tools, One Toolbox
Basic rules only integrate a handful of shapes. Substitution unwinds a composite function, integration by parts unwinds a product, and partial fractions splits an awkward fraction into easy pieces. The real skill is reading the integrand and picking the right tool.
Think of a locked box. If the lock is a single hidden mechanism (an inside function with its derivative nearby), substitution is the key that turns it. If the lock has two interlocking parts (a product of two different function types), integration by parts levers them apart one at a time. And if the box is actually several boxes taped together (one fraction hiding a sum of simpler fractions), partial fractions separates them so each opens with the standard key.
- 1
Read the integrand first. Is there an inside function whose derivative also appears? Is it a product of two unrelated function types? Is it one polynomial over another?
- 2
Pick the matching technique: substitution for composite forms, by parts for products, partial fractions for proper rational functions.
- 3
Apply the method carefully — form , apply , or find the constants and — keeping every line of working visible.
- 4
Finish cleanly: substitute back (or change the limits), simplify to an accepted form, and add for every indefinite integral.
Explore the concept
Use the live diagram and synced steps — play it or tap a step card to walk through.
Key formulas
Tap any symbol to reveal exactly what it means and its units.
Tap a symbol — great for exam definitions
Tap a symbol — great for exam definitions
Full topic notes
Formal explanation with the rigour you need for the exam.
1. Integration by substitution
Substitution is the chain rule reversed. It is the tool for a composite function — an inside function sitting inside an outer function — when the derivative (or a constant multiple of it) also appears in the integrand. By naming the inside function , you convert the whole integral into a simpler one in .
Let , so . Then .
The single most important mechanical step is forming correctly: differentiate , then treat as a fraction to get . Every and every in the original integral must disappear, replaced entirely by and . If any stray remains, your substitution is not yet complete.
2. Integration by parts
Integration by parts is the product rule reversed. It is the tool for integrating a product of two different function types — for example an algebraic function times an exponential, or an algebraic function times a logarithm — where substitution does not apply because there is no inside-function-and-its-derivative pattern.
Integration by parts: , equivalently .
The whole method turns on choosing and well. You differentiate (so you want it to get simpler) and integrate (so you must be able to integrate it). The LIATE rule ranks function types to make this choice: Logarithmic, Inverse trig, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential — choose as whichever type appears first in that list, and let be the rest.
Choose by LIATE. Logarithmic, Inverse trig, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential — is the earliest type present; it should simplify when differentiated.
Choose as the remaining factor (including ). You must be able to integrate it to find ; if you cannot, swap the roles.
Find and , then substitute into and integrate the new, simpler integral.
Repeat if needed. Integrals like need parts twice; returns the original integral, which you then solve algebraically.
3. Integration using partial fractions
A rational function that you cannot integrate directly can often be rewritten as a sum of simpler fractions that you can. For a proper rational function whose denominator factorises into distinct linear factors, each factor contributes one simple fraction with a constant on top — and each of those integrates to a logarithm.
For distinct linear factors: , with .
Check it is proper. Degree of numerator must be strictly less than degree of denominator; if not, do polynomial long division first.
Factorise the denominator completely into distinct linear factors, e.g. .
Set up the decomposition with one unknown constant per factor: .
Solve for the constants by clearing denominators and substituting the roots (the fast method) or equating coefficients.
Integrate each piece — every term gives a logarithm of the form .
4. Recognising which technique to use
Half the battle in Paper 1 is choosing the right method before you start. Work through the integrand's structure in order: it is faster to eliminate techniques than to force one that does not fit.
Is it a standard integral? If a basic rule integrates it directly, use that — do not over-engineer.
Inside function with its derivative present? Composite form → integration by substitution.
Product of two different function types? Algebraic exponential, algebraic log, algebraic trig → integration by parts, with chosen by LIATE.
One polynomial over another? Rational function → partial fractions (do long division first if it is improper).
None quite fits? Look for an algebraic tidy-up first — expanding, splitting a single fraction into a sum, or a trig identity — which often reveals a standard integral or a clean substitution.
Common mistakes examiners penalise
Not changing the limits after substituting — if you switch to but evaluate at the old -limits, you get a wrong value. Either change the limits to -values, or substitute back to before using the -limits, but never mix the two.
Forgetting to convert into — writing instead of , or leaving a stray in the integrand, means the substitution is incomplete and the integral is wrong.
Misremembering the by-parts formula — it is , not and not . A sign slip here loses method and accuracy marks together.
Choosing and the wrong way round — pick against LIATE (e.g. instead of in ) and the new integral gets harder. Recognise the signal and swap.
Dropping the constant of integration — every indefinite integral needs ; leaving it off costs the final accuracy mark even when the antiderivative is perfect.
Omitting the modulus in logarithms — . Writing without the modulus, or forgetting the factor, is a marked error.
Using partial fractions on an improper fraction — if you must divide first; setting up directly gives an unsolvable or wrong system.
Model answer — marked the way our engine marks it
In Paper 1 an integration question is marked analytically: the credit is tied to specific lines of working, not just the final expression. Each mark is either a method mark (M) — for the correct approach, such as choosing a valid substitution or applying the by-parts formula — or an accuracy mark (A) — for correct working or the correct answer. An A mark is dependent on the M mark it follows, so a right answer built on a wrong method earns neither. Equivalent correct forms are accepted, and an indefinite integral must carry . Study how each mark below is earned by a specific line.
Where this leads
These three techniques are the backbone of everything that follows in HL calculus. Substitution and by parts reappear when you compute areas between curves and volumes of revolution, where the integrand is rarely standard. Partial fractions is the gateway to integrating more of the rational functions that arise in differential equations and in the logistic and related growth models. And the habit that matters most — reading an integrand's structure before choosing a method — is exactly the judgement Paper 1 rewards. Master the decision map, write the method on the page, and complex integrals become variations on a routine you already own.
Worked examples
See the formulas applied — reveal one step at a time, like the exam.
Find . [4]
- 1
The inside function is , and its derivative appears (up to a constant) in the integrand. This signals substitution.
Evaluate . [5]
- 1
The inside function is and its derivative appears up to a constant, so substitute.
Find . [5]
- 1
This is a product of an algebraic function and a logarithmic function . Use integration by parts.
Find . [6]
- 1
First factorise the denominator: . The degree of the numerator () is less than that of the denominator (), so the fraction is proper. [M1: factorise denominator]
Find using integration by parts. [5]
- 1
Model answer — full working.
How it all connects
The big idea sits in the middle — tap a linked idea to explore the link.
Tap a linked idea to see how it connects back to the main topic — that connection is what examiners reward.
Glossary
Try to recall each definition before you reveal it.
Quick check
Answer in your head first — then tap to check. No pressure.
Revision flashcards
Flip the card. Test yourself before the exam.
The substitution rule
If then , and . It is the chain rule run in reverse.
Key takeaways
Review these before you close the topic — retrieval beats re-reading.
- ✓
Choose by LIATE. Logarithmic, Inverse trig, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential — is the earliest type present; it should simplify when differentiated.
- ✓
Choose as the remaining factor (including ). You must be able to integrate it to find ; if you cannot, swap the roles.
- ✓
Find and , then substitute into and integrate the new, simpler integral.
- ✓
Repeat if needed. Integrals like need parts twice; returns the original integral, which you then solve algebraically.
Practice — then mark it
The whole point: a real Cambridge question, marked mark-by-mark.
Get a Paper 1 answer marked: integrate by substitution, parts or partial fractions with full working
Get a Paper 1 answer marked: integrate by substitution, parts or partial fractions with full working
Extra simulations & links
PhET, GeoGebra and other curated tools — open in a new tab.
Frequently asked
Checkpoint
One marked question is worth ten re-reads — close the loop before you move on.
Reading it isn’t knowing it — prove it.
Before you move on: do Get a Paper 1 answer marked: integrate by substitution, parts or partial fractions with full working on paper, snap a photo, and get examiner-style feedback on exactly where you win and lose marks.