Community Q&A
A-Level Economics May/June 2024 Q1(c): Consider the extent to which the shortage of supply of labour in the Eurozone may have…
A-Level Economics · Paper 9708/22 · May/June 2024 · Question 1(c) · [4 marks]
Consider the extent to which the shortage of supply of labour in the Eurozone may have contributed towards the increasing rate of inflation.
A full-marks model answer with a mark-by-mark examiner breakdown is below.
1 answer
- accepted ✓
A shortage in the supply of labour in the Eurozone would lead to upward pressure on wages. As firms compete for a smaller pool of available workers, they must offer higher wage rates to attract and retain staff.
This increase in wages represents a rise in the costs of production for businesses. To protect their profit margins, firms are likely to pass these higher costs onto consumers in the form of higher prices. This is known as cost-push inflation and can be shown by a leftward shift of the Aggregate Supply (AS) curve, resulting in a higher general price level.
However, the labour shortage is not the only factor that has contributed to rising costs in the Eurozone. Firms have also faced significant increases in energy costs, which also increase the costs of production and add to inflationary pressures.
Therefore, the extent to which the labour shortage contributed to inflation depends on its relative impact compared to other cost pressures. If wage increases were a larger component of firms' total cost increases than rising energy prices, then the labour shortage was a major contributor. Conversely, if the surge in energy prices was the dominant factor, the impact of the labour shortage would be less significant in explaining the overall increase in the rate of inflation.
How the marks are awarded
- Mark 1 (AO2) — Awarded for the explicit link between a shortage of labour supply and the resulting increase in wage rates, as stated in the first sentence.
- Mark 2 (AO2) — Awarded for explaining the transmission mechanism where higher wages increase business costs, leading to cost-push inflation, as detailed in the second paragraph.
- Mark 3 (AO2) — Awarded for introducing an alternative factor that increases production costs, specifically the rise in energy costs, as mentioned in the third paragraph.
- Mark 4 (AO3) — Awarded for a valid evaluative statement that considers the 'extent' by weighing the relative importance of wage increases against other factors like energy costs, as done in the final paragraph.
Common mistakes
- Only explaining that a labour shortage causes inflation, without detailing the mechanism (wages rise -> costs rise -> prices rise).
- Confusing cost-push inflation with demand-pull inflation by arguing that higher wages increase aggregate demand.
- Failing to consider any other contributing factors to inflation, such as rising energy or raw material costs.
- Neglecting to offer any evaluation on the 'extent' of the contribution, thereby failing to answer the question fully and missing the AO3 mark.
Examiner tip: When a question asks you to 'consider the extent', always analyse the primary factor mentioned and then introduce and weigh it against other relevant factors to provide a balanced evaluation.
AI-generated model answer, grounded in the official Cambridge mark scheme and reviewed by the MarkScheme team. Mark your own answer to this question →
Your answer
Sign in to answer this question.