A-Level Economics May/June 2024 Q1(e): Assess the extent to which supply-side policies will be able to 'lead Sri Lanka back in…

1 answer

• ▲0
  accepted ✓

  Supply-side policies aim to increase the productive potential of an economy by improving the quantity or quality of factors of production, shifting the Long-Run Aggregate Supply (LRAS) curve to the right. Their ability to lead Sri Lanka back into economic growth can be assessed by considering their benefits and drawbacks in the country's specific context.

  On one hand, supply-side policies offer significant potential for long-term, sustainable growth. For instance, interventionist policies such as increased government spending on education and vocational training can enhance the skills and human capital of the Sri Lankan workforce. A better-trained labour force becomes more productive, leading to lower costs for firms and an increase in the economy's potential output. (M1) Furthermore, market-based policies like deregulation and privatisation can make markets more competitive and efficient. Reducing bureaucratic 'red tape' for starting a business or privatising inefficient state-owned enterprises could encourage both domestic and foreign direct investment, boosting enterprise and increasing the nation's capital stock. This would directly contribute to a higher potential for economic growth. (M1)

  However, there are considerable limitations to relying solely on these policies to address Sri Lanka's immediate economic challenges. A major drawback is the significant time lag involved. Policies aimed at improving education or infrastructure can take many years, or even decades, to yield noticeable effects on growth. They will not provide the quick recovery that Sri Lanka currently needs. (M1) Another critical issue is the cost. Implementing large-scale education, training, or infrastructure projects is extremely expensive. Given Sri Lanka's recent sovereign debt crisis and fiscal constraints, financing such policies without external aid or further borrowing would be exceptionally difficult, potentially worsening its financial instability. (M1)

  In conclusion, the extent to which supply-side policies can lead Sri Lanka back into growth is significant in the long run, but limited in the short run. While they are essential for building a foundation for sustainable, long-term prosperity by enhancing productivity and competitiveness, they are not a panacea for the immediate crisis. (E1) Their success is heavily contingent on other factors. For these policies to translate into actual growth, there must be sufficient aggregate demand to absorb the increased potential output. Therefore, they must be implemented as part of a comprehensive strategy that includes short-term demand-side stabilisation and policies to ensure fiscal sustainability and political stability. They are a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for recovery. (E1)

  ---

  How the marks are awarded

  • M1 — The answer identifies a benefit of supply-side policy: investment in education and training improves workforce productivity, increasing potential output.
  • M1 — A second benefit is explained: market-based policies like deregulation encourage investment and enterprise, increasing the capital stock and productive capacity.
  • M1 — The answer identifies a key drawback: the significant time lags before policies like education reform have a tangible impact on economic growth.
  • M1 — A further drawback is explained: the high cost of implementation, which is a major challenge for a country like Sri Lanka with severe fiscal constraints.
  • E1 — A valid conclusion is reached by weighing the benefits and drawbacks, judging that the policies are effective for long-term growth but are not a short-term solution for Sri Lanka's immediate crisis.
  • E1 — The evaluation is further developed by making the conclusion conditional, stating that the success of supply-side policies depends on other factors like sufficient aggregate demand and fiscal stability, requiring a broader policy mix.

  Common mistakes

  • Simply listing types of supply-side policies (e.g., 'privatisation') without explaining the mechanism through which they would lead to economic growth.
  • Providing a one-sided answer that only discusses the benefits, failing to 'assess the extent' by considering the significant drawbacks and limitations.
  • Confusing supply-side policies with demand-side policies, for example by suggesting an increase in general government spending to boost aggregate demand.
  • Writing a generic answer about supply-side policies without applying it to the specific context of Sri Lanka's recent economic crisis and need for recovery.

  Examiner tip: For 'assess the extent' questions, always build a two-sided argument before reaching a nuanced, contextualised conclusion that weighs the relative importance of your points.

  ---

  AI-generated model answer, grounded in the official Cambridge mark scheme and reviewed by the MarkScheme team. Mark your own answer to this question →

  @markscheme_answers

Your answer

Sign in to answer this question.