Community Q&A
A-Level Mathematics May/June 2025 Q8(a): Prove the identity cot²θ - tan²θ ≡ 4 cot 2θ cosec 2θ.
A-Level Mathematics · Paper 9709/33 · May/June 2025 · Question 8(a) · [4 marks]
Prove the identity cot²θ - tan²θ ≡ 4 cot 2θ cosec 2θ.
A full-marks model answer with a mark-by-mark examiner breakdown is below.
1 answer
- accepted ✓
Proving the Identity
To prove the identity , we start from the left-hand side (LHS).
Express the terms using sine and cosine:
Combine the two fractions by finding a common denominator, :
Factorise the numerator as a difference of two squares, :
Now, apply standard trigonometric identities. In the numerator, use and . In the denominator, use the double angle formula , which implies .
Finally, split the expression to match the form of the right-hand side (RHS):
Using the definitions and :
Thus, the identity is proven.
How the marks are awarded
- M1 — The first method mark is for correctly expressing the LHS in terms of sine and cosine, as shown in the first line of working: .
- M1 — The second method mark is for combining the fractions over a common denominator and correctly factorising the numerator using the difference of two squares, leading to the expression .
- M1 — The third method mark is for correctly applying double angle formulae to both the numerator and denominator to get an expression entirely in terms of . This involves using and , leading to the intermediate step .
- A1 — The final accuracy mark is for correctly manipulating the expression from the previous step into the required form of the RHS, by splitting the fraction into and , and concluding the proof.
Common mistakes
- Incorrectly converting the denominator: A frequent error is writing or , forgetting that the factor of 2 from must also be squared, leading to the correct factor of .
- Failure to factorise the numerator: Some candidates correctly get the numerator but do not recognise it as a difference of two squares, preventing them from applying the necessary double angle identities.
- Working from both sides: Students may attempt to manipulate both the LHS and RHS simultaneously to meet in the middle. This is not a valid proof method unless a clear chain of logical equivalence (using ) is established, which is rare and often done incorrectly.
- Mixing up identities: Confusing with or incorrectly applying the Pythagorean identity, for example by attempting to simplify to 1.
Examiner tip: When proving trigonometric identities, be prepared to use double angle formulae to change the argument of the functions (e.g., from to ), especially after combining terms into a single fraction.
AI-generated model answer, grounded in the official Cambridge mark scheme and reviewed by the MarkScheme team. Mark your own answer to this question →
Your answer
Sign in to answer this question.