A-Level Economics October/November 2024 Q5(b): Assess whether the achievement of a balanced budget should always be a main government…

1 answer

• ▲0
  accepted ✓

  A government's budget is balanced when its total revenue, primarily from taxation, equals its total expenditure in a given fiscal year. The main macroeconomic objectives typically include low and stable inflation, low unemployment, sustainable economic growth, and a stable balance of payments. The question asks whether achieving a balanced budget should always be a primary objective alongside these.

  There are compelling arguments for prioritising a balanced budget. Firstly, it enforces fiscal discipline and prevents the accumulation of national debt. A persistent budget deficit (where G > T) must be financed by borrowing, which adds to the national debt. A large and growing national debt can have severe negative consequences. The government must pay interest on this debt, creating a significant opportunity cost; these funds could otherwise be spent on merit goods like education or healthcare. Furthermore, high levels of government borrowing can lead to 'crowding out'. To fund its deficit, the government increases the demand for loanable funds, which can drive up interest rates. Higher interest rates make it more expensive for private firms to borrow and invest, potentially hindering long-term economic growth. A commitment to a balanced budget can therefore foster a stable macroeconomic environment conducive to private investment. For example, Germany's constitutional 'debt brake' is designed to enforce such fiscal prudence, enhancing investor confidence.

  Secondly, a balanced budget can be seen as a matter of inter-generational equity. Running persistent deficits means that current consumption and government services are being paid for by future generations, who will be burdened with higher taxes or lower public spending to service and repay the debt. A balanced budget ensures that the current generation pays for its own spending.

  However, rigidly pursuing a balanced budget is not always appropriate and can be counter-productive. According to Keynesian economic theory, fiscal policy is a crucial tool for managing aggregate demand (AD). During a recession, an economy experiences falling output and rising unemployment. In this scenario, tax revenues automatically fall and spending on unemployment benefits rises, pushing the budget towards a deficit. These are 'automatic stabilisers'. If a government were to strictly adhere to a balanced budget, it would have to raise taxes or cut spending. This contractionary fiscal policy would reduce AD (shifting the AD curve further to the left), deepening the recession and exacerbating unemployment. Instead, most economists argue that the government should run a budget deficit during a downturn. By increasing government spending (G) or cutting taxes (T), it can inject demand into the economy, shifting the AD curve to the right, stimulating growth and reducing cyclical unemployment.

  Furthermore, a budget deficit can be justified for financing long-term capital investment. Spending on infrastructure, such as new transport networks or high-speed internet, or on education and research, increases the economy's productive capacity and shifts the long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) curve to the right. While this requires borrowing and creates a deficit in the short run, the long-term returns in the form of higher economic growth and future tax revenues can outweigh the costs of the debt. Insisting on a balanced budget could starve the economy of these vital public investments.

  In conclusion, while fiscal prudence is a laudable long-term aim, the achievement of a balanced budget should not always be a main macroeconomic objective. Its importance is conditional on the state of the economy. During periods of stable economic growth, aiming for a balanced budget or even a surplus to pay down debt is sensible. However, during a recession or a major crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, objectives like maintaining employment and preventing economic collapse take precedence, necessitating a significant budget deficit. A more sophisticated objective is to achieve a cyclically-adjusted balanced budget over the medium term, allowing deficits during downturns and surpluses during booms. Therefore, fiscal flexibility is more important than the rigid, annual pursuit of a balanced budget.

  ---

  How it reaches the top band

  • Knowledge / Analysis / Evaluation — The essay demonstrates detailed knowledge by accurately defining a balanced budget and linking it to core macroeconomic objectives. The analysis is well-developed, exploring both the arguments for (fiscal discipline, crowding out, inter-generational equity) and against (Keynesian demand management, automatic stabilisers, long-term investment) a balanced budget as a primary goal. The essay explains the economic mechanisms clearly, for instance, describing how a deficit can boost aggregate demand in a recession. The evaluation is strong because it moves beyond a simple list of pros and cons. It synthesises the arguments by introducing the crucial context of the economic cycle, arguing that the policy's appropriateness is conditional. The conclusion provides a clear, decisive, and well-justified judgement that directly addresses the 'always' in the question, prioritising objectives and suggesting a more nuanced policy goal (a cyclically-adjusted balance), which demonstrates a high level of economic understanding.

  Common ways to drop marks

  • Confusing the budget deficit (a flow over a year) with the national debt (a stock accumulated over time).
  • Presenting a one-sided argument, for example, only stating that deficits are bad without considering their role in a recession.
  • Failing to use specific economic theory, such as Keynesian demand management or the concept of automatic stabilisers, to support arguments.
  • Providing a weak conclusion that simply summarises points without making a clear judgement on whether a balanced budget should 'always' be a main objective.

  Examiner tip: For 'assess' questions, always consider the context and conditions under which a policy might be appropriate or inappropriate to build a strong, nuanced evaluation.

  ---

  AI-generated exemplar, grounded in the official Cambridge assessment bands and reviewed by the MarkScheme team. Mark your own answer →

  @markscheme_answers

Your answer

Sign in to answer this question.