Skip to content

9701 · 28.2

General characteristic chemical properties of the first set of transition elements, titanium to copper — common mistakes

Common exam mistakes on 9701 General characteristic chemical properties of the first set of transition elements, titanium to copper. Learn what loses marks, then practise the topic with Examiner’s Ink.

Exam tip 1

When asked to explain why a complex is coloured, you must mention the splitting of d-orbitals by ligands, the absorption of energy from visible light for d-d electron transition, and that the observed colour is the complement of the light absorbed. Simply stating 'it has a partially filled d-subshell' is insufficient for full marks.

Exam tip 2

Be prepared to use standard electrode potential (E°) data from the data booklet to predict the feasibility of a redox reaction involving transition metal ions and to explain the relative stability of different oxidation states under standard conditions.

Exam tip 3

Pay close attention to the formulae of complex ions, including the overall charge, coordination number, and the ligands involved. For example, distinguish between [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ and [CuCl₄]²⁻, noting the change in charge and coordination number.

Exam tip 4

Memorise the key colour changes for redox reactions involving transition metals. Manganate(VII) (MnO4MnO_4^-) is deep purple and is reduced to the almost colourless Mn2+Mn^{2+} ion. Dichromate(VI) (Cr2O72Cr_2O_7^{2-}) is orange and is reduced to the green Cr3+Cr^{3+} ion. These are essential for both qualitative analysis and titration calculations.

Are all compounds of transition elements coloured?

No, this is a common misconception. A compound will be colourless if the central metal ion does not have a partially filled d-subshell. For example, compounds containing scandium(III) (Sc³⁺, 3d⁰ configuration), titanium(IV) (Ti⁴⁺, 3d⁰), copper(I) (Cu⁺, 3d¹⁰), and zinc(II) (Zn²⁺, 3d¹⁰) are typically white or colourless because d-d transitions are not possible.

Why can iron form stable Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ ions, while a Group 2 metal like calcium only forms Ca²⁺?

For iron, the first two ionisation energies to remove the 4s electrons are relatively low, forming Fe²⁺. The third ionisation energy to remove a 3d electron is not prohibitively large because the 3d and 4s orbitals are close in energy, allowing stable Fe³⁺ to form. For calcium, after removing the two 4s electrons to form Ca²⁺, the third ionisation energy is extremely high as it would involve removing a core electron from the stable 3p sub-shell.

In a ligand substitution reaction, does the coordination number of the central metal ion always change?

Not necessarily. While some substitutions do involve a change in coordination number (e.g., octahedral [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ changing to tetrahedral [CuCl₄]²⁻), many do not. For example, when aqueous cobalt(II) ions react with excess ammonia, the six water ligands are replaced by six ammonia ligands, and the coordination number remains six: [Co(H₂O)₆]²⁺ + 6NH₃ → [Co(NH₃)₆]²⁺ + 6H₂O.