Worked example 1
Two companies dispute a £200,000 supply contract. One wants confidentiality and a quick resolution; the other insists on a binding outcome without going to court. Advise on suitable ADR methods and evaluate whether a court could penalise refusal to mediate. [10 marks]
Show solution outline
Issue: Which ADR method fits, and consequences of refusing mediation.
Negotiation: Cheapest first step — parties' solicitors can exchange without prejudice offers. Non-binding unless agreement reached.
Mediation: Suitable for confidentiality and relationship preservation. Mediator facilitates but does not decide. Outcome only binding if parties sign settlement agreement.
Arbitration: Best where parties want a binding, private decision without public court process. Arbitrator's award enforceable as contract; appeal grounds narrow (s69 Arbitration Act 1996).
Court penalties: Under Halsey v Milton Keynes NHS Trust, courts may impose adverse costs orders if a party unreasonably refuses ADR. Factors: nature of dispute, merits, costs of ADR vs trial, delay, and whether ADR had reasonable prospect of success.
Conclusion: Start with negotiation; if deadlock, arbitration meets both parties' needs for a binding and confidential outcome. Unreasonable refusal of mediation risks costs sanctions even if the refusing party wins at trial.
Exam tip: Match method to party priorities — binding vs non-binding, cost, speed, confidentiality.