Worked example 1
A client needs representation in a complex High Court trial. Compare the roles of solicitors and barristers in preparing and conducting the case, and explain how recent reforms have affected the traditional division. [10 marks]
Show solution outline
Issue: Division of work between solicitors and barristers, and impact of fusion reforms.
Solicitor role: Case management — take instructions, gather evidence, instruct experts, draft pleadings, conduct disclosure, liaise with client. May appear in court for interlocutory hearings and, if qualified as solicitor advocate, conduct full trial in higher courts.
Barrister role: Provide specialist opinion, draft complex pleadings, advocate at trial — examination, cross-examination, legal submissions. Traditionally instructed via solicitor (cab-rank rule applies).
Traditional division: Solicitor = office work + client contact; barrister = court specialist. Efficient but can add cost and delay.
Reforms: Solicitor higher rights of audience — fusion in practice. Direct access — clients may instruct barristers without solicitor. ABS — non-lawyers may own firms, increasing commercial pressure.
Conclusion: Distinction blurring; barristers still dominate complex advocacy but solicitors increasingly conduct serious trials.
Exam tip: Describe traditional roles first, then show how reforms change the picture — don't treat them as entirely separate worlds.