Worked example 1
After a negligent road accident, Kai suffers a broken leg, resulting in six months off work where he lost £24,000 in earnings. His pre-trial medical costs were £3,000. He also suffers from ongoing noise from a neighbour's illegal extension (nuisance). Advise on the tort remedies available to Kai.
Show solution outline
1. Claim against the Negligent Driver:
Kai can claim compensatory damages based on the principle of restitutio in integrum.
Special Damages (Pecuniary loss pre-trial): These must be specifically pleaded and proved.
- Lost earnings (6 months): £24,000
- Past medical costs: £3,000
- Total Special Damages: £27,000
General Damages (Losses not precisely calculable):
- Non-Pecuniary Loss: For the pain, suffering, and loss of amenity (PSLA) from the broken leg. The court will assess this amount by referring to judicial guidelines (Judicial College Guidelines) and precedent cases for similar injuries.
- Future Pecuniary Loss: If the leg injury permanently affects his future earning capacity, a claim for future loss of earnings would be calculated using the multiplier/multiplicand method.
Potential Deduction: If Kai was contributorily negligent (e.g., not wearing a seatbelt), his damages would be reduced under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945, as per the principles in Froom v Butcher.
2. Claim against the Neighbour (Private Nuisance):
- Injunction: As the noise is ongoing, damages may be an inadequate remedy. Kai could seek a prohibitory injunction to stop the noise. The court will weigh the competing interests, as seen in Coventry v Lawrence.
- Damages: Kai can also claim damages for the loss of amenity (enjoyment of his property) caused by the noise up to the date the injunction is granted.