Worked example 1
Explain impulse control disorders using biological and learning theory approaches. Evaluate the reductionist nature of biological explanations. [10 marks]
Show solution outline
AO1 — Biological explanation:
- Prefrontal cortex regulates executive control and inhibits inappropriate behaviour.
- Dysfunction (injury, developmental deficit) → reduced behavioural inhibition.
- Low serotonin linked to impulsivity — supported by some response to SSRIs in kleptomania/pyromania.
AO1 — Learning theory explanation:
- Tension–release cycle maintained by operant conditioning.
- Impulsive act → relief/pleasure (negative reinforcement) → urge strengthened over repetitions.
- Antecedents (stress, boredom) become cues triggering impulse via classical conditioning.
AO3 — Evaluation of biological reductionism:
- Strengths: Neuroimaging and pharmacology offer objective evidence; guides drug treatment.
- Limitations: Reductionist — ignores social learning, poverty, peer influence; not all impulsive individuals show brain abnormalities.
- Incomplete causality: Biology may correlate with rather than cause behaviour — chicken-and-egg problem.
- Free will vs determinism: Biological account suggests hard determinism — problematic for legal responsibility.
Judgement: Most complete account is interactionist — biological vulnerability lowers inhibition threshold while learning maintains the urge–relief habit.