Skip to content

9990 · 2.4.2

Selling the product — practice questions

Practice and worked examples for 9990 Selling the product. Short previews only — attempt the full question in MarkScheme against the official scheme.

Worked example 1

A gym offers a free one-day pass (used by 200 people). Staff then ask sign-ups for a £500 annual membership; 45 agree. Those who decline are offered a £120 three-month trial instead; 60 more agree. The gym displays 'Only 5 memberships left at this price'. Identify the techniques used and evaluate their ethics.

Show solution outline

Free pass — reciprocity: Free trial creates obligation to reciprocate — Cialdini's most exploited principle in sales. 200 trials generate pool for conversion.

Annual membership after trial — foot-in-the-door: Accepting free pass = initial commitment → more likely to agree to larger request (annual fee). Self-perception — 'I use gyms, I am a gym person'.

Three-month fallback — door-in-the-face: £500 refused£120 appears reasonable by contrast — reciprocal concession from 'salesperson'.

'Only 5 left' — scarcity + loss aversion: Creates urgency and FOMO — exploits loss aversion (2.3.3) — fear of losing deal outweighs careful evaluation.

Evaluate — effectiveness: Multi-technique sales funnel — 105 conversions from 200 trials (52.5%) suggests strong ecological validity.

Evaluate — ethics: Manipulation of automatic compliance responses — customers may not reflect on true need. Scarcity claim may be fabricated — deceptive. Vulnerable groups (body-image anxiety) especially susceptible. Counter — no force used; consumer autonomy technically preserved. Regulation (cooling-off periods, clear contract terms) partially protects.

Worked example 2

A charity tests two approaches on 200 people each to increase monthly donations. Approach A asks people to first sign a petition to 'support animal welfare' before asking for a £10 monthly donation; 42 people donated. Approach B directly asks for a £10 monthly donation; 22 people donated. Calculate the compliance rates and explain the psychological principle at work in Approach A.

Show solution outline

1. Identify the Technique: Approach A uses the Foot-in-the-Door (FITD) technique. The small initial request is signing the petition, and the larger target request is the £10 monthly donation.

2. Calculate Compliance Rates:

  • Approach A (FITD): Compliance Rate = (Number of donations / Total people asked) × 100 = (42 / 200) × 100 = 21%.
  • Approach B (Control): Compliance Rate = (Number of donations / Total people asked) × 100 = (22 / 200) × 100 = 11%.

3. Analyse Effectiveness: The FITD technique resulted in a compliance rate of 21%, which is 90.9% higher than the 11% rate of the direct request group ((21-11)/11 * 100). This demonstrates the effectiveness of the sequential request strategy.

4. Explain the Psychology (Commitment & Consistency): By signing the petition, individuals in Group A made a small, initial commitment. This alters their self-perception; they now see themselves as someone who supports animal welfare. To remain consistent with this new self-image, they feel an internal pressure to agree to the subsequent, larger request (the donation). Refusing the donation would create cognitive dissonance. This aligns with Cialdini's principle of Commitment and Consistency.