Skip to content

9990 · 3.3.2

Measuring pain — practice questions

Practice and worked examples for 9990 Measuring pain. Short previews only — attempt the full question in MarkScheme against the official scheme.

Worked example 1

A nurse uses a 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale to assess post-operative pain. A patient rates pain as 3/10 but is observed grimacing and refusing to mobilise.

(a) Identify the measurement methods being used and one discrepancy between them. [3 marks] (b) Explain how the McGill Pain Questionnaire would provide additional information. [3 marks] (c) Evaluate the validity of self-report pain scales. [6 marks]

Show solution outline

(a) Methods and discrepancy:

  • Self-report: NRS (0–10 numeric rating) — patient rates pain as 3/10 (mild).
  • Behavioural observation: Grimacing and guarding/refusing mobilisation — suggests moderate-to-severe pain behaviour.
  • Discrepancy: Self-report (3) underestimates pain compared to behavioural indicators — possible ** stoicism**, social desirability (not wanting to bother staff), or under-reporting due to opioid stigma.

(b) McGill Pain Questionnaire added value:

  • Captures pain quality — sensory descriptors ("sharp," "throbbing"), affective ("sickening," "tiring"), evaluative ("annoying," "miserable").
  • Would reveal whether patient experiences deep aching (surgical site) vs surface pain — guides analgesic choice.
  • Present Pain Intensity subscale provides standardised intensity score comparable across patients.

(c) Evaluation of self-report validity:

  • Strengths: Respects subjective nature of pain; VAS/NRS show good test–retest reliability in stable pain; sensitive to treatment change.
  • Limitations:
    • Social desirability — patients underreport to appear brave or avoid dependency label.
    • Cultural variation — some cultures express pain openly, others stoically — same score may mean different experiences.
    • Cognitive factors: Kahneman — peak-end rule means recall of pain depends on worst moment and most recent sensation, not average.
    • No objective ground truth — cannot establish criterion validity against a gold standard.
    • Children and non-verbal patients — self-report impossible; behavioural scales (FLACC, COMFORT) needed.

Judgement: Self-report is necessary but insufficient — combine NRS with behavioural observation and McGill for comprehensive assessment.

Worked example 2

A patient with chronic neuropathic pain completes the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). From the sensory dimension word groups, they choose the following words:

  • Group 1: Quivering (rank 2)
  • Group 3: Piercing (rank 2)
  • Group 8: Stinging (rank 4)
  • Group 10: Tearing (rank 3)

Calculate the patient's Pain Rating Index for the sensory dimension (PRI-S). Explain what this score represents.

Show solution outline

Step 1: Understand the scoring method. The Pain Rating Index (PRI) for each dimension (sensory, affective, evaluative) is calculated by summing the rank values of the words chosen by the patient from the respective groups. Each word within a group has a pre-assigned integer rank value indicating its intensity.

Step 2: List the rank values of the chosen words. Based on the information provided:

  • 'Quivering' (from Group 1) has a rank value of 2.
  • 'Piercing' (from Group 3) has a rank value of 2.
  • 'Stinging' (from Group 8) has a rank value of 4.
  • 'Tearing' (from Group 10) has a rank value of 3.

Step 3: Perform the calculation. Sum the rank values to find the PRI-S. PRI-S = (Rank of Quivering) + (Rank of Piercing) + (Rank of Stinging) + (Rank of Tearing) PRI-S = 2 + 2 + 4 + 3

Step 4: State the final answer and interpretation. PRI-S = 11

Interpretation: The patient's Pain Rating Index for the sensory dimension is 11. This quantitative score represents the intensity of the sensory qualities of their pain (e.g., its temporal, thermal, and incisive properties). It does not describe the emotional impact (affective dimension) but provides a specific measure that can be used to track the effectiveness of treatments targeting the sensory aspects of their neuropathic pain.