Skip to content

7115 · 5.5

Analysis of accounts — practice questions

Practice and worked examples for 7115 Analysis of accounts. Short previews only — attempt the full question in MarkScheme against the official scheme.

Worked example 1

Current assets $240 000 (including inventory $90 000). Current liabilities 160000.160 000.

Calculate both ratios and comment.

Show solution outline

Current ratio = 240 000 ÷ 160 000 = 1.5 : 1

Acid test = (240 000 − 90 000) ÷ 160 000 = 150 000 ÷ 160 000 = 0.94 : 1

Comment: Current ratio suggests adequate cover, but acid test below 1:1 — without selling inventory, the firm may struggle to pay short-term debts. Consider reducing inventory or speeding up receivables collection.

Worked example 2

A retail company has the following figures in its Statement of Financial Position for the year ended 31 December 2023:

  • Current Assets: 350,000350,000
  • Inventories: 200,000200,000
  • Current Liabilities: 150,000150,000

Calculate the current ratio and the acid test ratio, and comment on the company's liquidity.

Show solution outline

1. Current Ratio

This ratio measures if the company has enough current assets to cover its current liabilities.

Current AssetsCurrent Liabilities=$350,000$150,000=2.33\frac{\text{Current Assets}}{\text{Current Liabilities}} = \frac{\text{\textdollar}350,000}{\text{\textdollar}150,000} = 2.33

The current ratio is 2.33 : 1.

2. Acid Test (Quick) Ratio

This is a stricter test that excludes inventory, which can be hard to sell quickly.

Current AssetsInventoriesCurrent Liabilities=$350,000$200,000$150,000=$150,000$150,000=1\frac{\text{Current Assets} - \text{Inventories}}{\text{Current Liabilities}} = \frac{\text{\textdollar}350,000 - \text{\textdollar}200,000}{\text{\textdollar}150,000} = \frac{\text{\textdollar}150,000}{\text{\textdollar}150,000} = 1

The acid test ratio is 1 : 1.

3. Comment

The current ratio of 2.33:1 is strong, suggesting the business is in a good position to pay its short-term debts. However, the acid test ratio of 1:1, while acceptable, reveals a heavy dependence on inventory. The large difference between the two ratios indicates that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in stock. If this inventory is slow-moving or becomes obsolete, the company's liquidity position would be much weaker than the current ratio suggests.