Skip to content

9609 · 7.1.5

Centralisation and decentralisation — practice questions

Practice and worked examples for 9609 Centralisation and decentralisation. Short previews only — attempt the full question in MarkScheme against the official scheme.

Worked example 1

Fast-food chain with 800 franchised outlets wants uniform brand but franchisees demand local menu items. Discuss centralisation vs decentralisation of menu decisions.

Show solution outline

Central case: Brand consistency — customers expect same core menu; central purchasing lowers food cost.

Decentral case: Local tastes (spicy options, religious dietary needs) boost local sales (3.1.5 segmentation).

Hybrid (typical): Core menu central; 10% local items approved by regional manager — controlled decentralisation.

Controls: Central food safety standards; franchisees cannot change recipes without approval.

Worked example 2

RetailCo operates 50 stores and is deciding whether to centralise purchasing for a key product. Centralised purchasing secures a discount but may lead to lower sales due to poor local adaptation. Decentralised purchasing costs more per unit but allows local managers to match stock to local demand, boosting sales.

Data:

  • Annual demand: 20,000 units
  • Average selling price: $120 per unit

Centralised Option:

  • Unit cost: $60 (after bulk discount)
  • Estimated sales rate: 85% of stock

Decentralised Option:

  • Unit cost: $70 (no discount)
  • Estimated sales rate: 95% of stock

Analyse the financial implications and recommend a strategy for RetailCo.

Show solution outline

Step 1: Analyse the Centralised Option

  • Calculate Total Procurement Cost: This is the cost of buying all 20,000 units at the discounted price. Cost=Total Units×Unit Cost\text{Cost} = \text{Total Units} \times \text{Unit Cost} Cost=20,000×$60=$1,200,000\text{Cost} = 20,000 \times \text{\textdollar}60 = \text{\textdollar}1,200,000

  • Calculate Expected Sales Revenue: Sales are expected to be 85% of the total stock. Units Sold=Total Units×Sales Rate\text{Units Sold} = \text{Total Units} \times \text{Sales Rate} Units Sold=20,000×85%=17,000 units\text{Units Sold} = 20,000 \times 85\% = 17,000 \text{ units} Revenue=Units Sold×Selling Price\text{Revenue} = \text{Units Sold} \times \text{Selling Price} Revenue=17,000×$120=$2,040,000\text{Revenue} = 17,000 \times \text{\textdollar}120 = \text{\textdollar}2,040,000

  • Calculate Gross Profit (Centralised): Gross Profit=RevenueTotal Procurement Cost\text{Gross Profit} = \text{Revenue} - \text{Total Procurement Cost} Gross Profit=$2,040,000$1,200,000=$840,000\text{Gross Profit} = \text{\textdollar}2,040,000 - \text{\textdollar}1,200,000 = \text{\textdollar}840,000

Step 2: Analyse the Decentralised Option

  • Calculate Total Procurement Cost: This is the cost of buying all 20,000 units at the standard price. Cost=20,000×$70=$1,400,000\text{Cost} = 20,000 \times \text{\textdollar}70 = \text{\textdollar}1,400,000

  • Calculate Expected Sales Revenue: Sales are expected to be 95% of the total stock due to better local matching. Units Sold=20,000×95%=19,000 units\text{Units Sold} = 20,000 \times 95\% = 19,000 \text{ units} Revenue=19,000×$120=$2,280,000\text{Revenue} = 19,000 \times \text{\textdollar}120 = \text{\textdollar}2,280,000

  • Calculate Gross Profit (Decentralised): Gross Profit=$2,280,000$1,400,000=$880,000\text{Gross Profit} = \text{\textdollar}2,280,000 - \text{\textdollar}1,400,000 = \text{\textdollar}880,000

Step 3: Compare and Recommend

  • Profit Comparison:

    • Centralised Gross Profit: 840,000840,000
    • Decentralised Gross Profit: 880,000880,000
  • Difference: $880,000$840,000=$40,000\text{\textdollar}880,000 - \text{\textdollar}840,000 = \text{\textdollar}40,000

Conclusion & Recommendation:

The financial analysis shows that the decentralised purchasing strategy is expected to generate $40,000 more in gross profit than the centralised strategy. The higher revenue from better sales forecasting outweighs the higher unit cost.

Recommendation: RetailCo should adopt a decentralised purchasing strategy for this product line. This not only offers a financial advantage but will also empower local managers, potentially increasing their motivation and responsiveness to local market trends. However, the company should ensure strong communication channels are in place to share best practices between stores.