Skip to content

9609 · 7.3.2

Theories of leadership — practice questions

Practice and worked examples for 9609 Theories of leadership. Short previews only — attempt the full question in MarkScheme against the official scheme.

Worked example 1

New plant manager joins a failing factory with a demoralised, inexperienced team. Which leadership approach fits and why?

Show solution outline

Situational analysis: The team has low competence + low confidence. According to Hersey and Blanchard's model, this corresponds to the R1 (unable and unwilling) readiness level. This requires a high task, low relationship ('Telling' or 'Directing') style initially to provide clear instructions and supervise closely.

Initial Actions (Directing Style):

  1. Set clear, achievable daily targets.
  2. Provide detailed instructions for tasks.
  3. Monitor performance closely and provide immediate feedback.

Transition Plan: As the team's skills improve (moving to R2 - unable but willing), the manager should transition to a high task, high relationship ('Selling' or 'Coaching') style. This involves explaining decisions and providing opportunities for clarification to build confidence.

Evaluation: A purely laissez-faire style would worsen the chaos. A purely transformational style might fail initially because the team lacks the basic skills and discipline to act on a vision. A situational approach allows the manager to adapt their style as the team develops, making it the most appropriate choice.

Worked example 2

A software development team's productivity has dropped by 20% over the last quarter, and two key developers have resigned, citing poor management. The manager, Priya, was assessed using the Blake Mouton Managerial Grid based on team feedback (scores out of 9). Her 'Concern for Production' score was 8, and her 'Concern for People' score was 2. Analyse Priya's leadership style and recommend a change, calculating the potential financial impact of improved productivity.

Show solution outline

Step 1: Identify and analyse the current leadership style. Priya's scores of (8, 2) on the Blake Mouton Grid place her in the 'Authority-Obedience' (or 'Produce-or-Perish') quadrant. This style prioritises task completion over employee well-being, which explains the high productivity targets but also the low morale and high staff turnover.

Step 2: Quantify the current problem.

  • Productivity Loss: The team's target output is valued at $150,000 per quarter. A 20% drop in productivity represents a financial loss. Productivity Loss=$150,000×20%=$30,000 per quarter\text{Productivity Loss} = \text{\textdollar}150,000 \times 20\% = \text{\textdollar}30,000 \text{ per quarter}
  • Turnover Cost: The cost to replace one skilled developer (recruitment, training, lost output) is estimated at $25,000. Two developers have resigned. Turnover Cost=2×$25,000=$50,000\text{Turnover Cost} = 2 \times \text{\textdollar}25,000 = \text{\textdollar}50,000
  • Total Quarterly Loss: Total Loss=$30,000+$50,000=$80,000\text{Total Loss} = \text{\textdollar}30,000 + \text{\textdollar}50,000 = \text{\textdollar}80,000

Step 3: Recommend a change in leadership style. Based on the Blake Mouton model, Priya should aim for a 'Team Management' style (9, 9), which shows high concern for both production and people. This involves fostering collaboration, seeking input, and supporting team members' development while maintaining high standards.

Step 4: Project the potential financial improvement. Assume that by adopting a 'Team Management' style, productivity can be restored to its target level, and future turnover can be prevented in the next quarter.

  • Productivity Gain: The $30,000 quarterly loss is eliminated.
  • Avoided Turnover Cost: The $50,000 cost of replacing staff is avoided in the next quarter.
  • Projected Net Gain: The recommended change could lead to a financial improvement of $80,000 in the following quarter compared to the current trajectory.