Skip to content

9699 · 8.2

Globalisation and migration — practice questions

Practice and worked examples for 9699 Globalisation and migration. Short previews only — attempt the full question in MarkScheme against the official scheme.

Worked example 1

Assess the economic impact of migration on receiving countries. [15 marks]

Show solution outline

Positive impacts: Fills labour shortages; young workers support ageing populations; skills and entrepreneurship; cultural diversity and trade links; tax contributions.

Negative claims: Strain on public services (debated — migrants often net contributors); wage suppression for low-skilled natives (conflicting evidence); housing pressure in certain areas.

Theoretical lenses: Functionalist — role allocation; Marxist — cheap reserve army of labour; Weber — ethnic competition for resources.

Evaluation: Net economic effect often positive at national level but uneven locally — depends on policy, skills match, integration.

Conclusion: Migration generally benefits receiving economies but political debate focuses on distributional issues.

Worked example 2

In 2022, the Philippines, with a GDP of approximately $405 billion, received $36.1 billion in personal remittances from its citizens working abroad. Calculate the contribution of these remittances to the Philippines' GDP and briefly explain one positive and one negative consequence of this reliance on remittances.

Show solution outline

Part 1: Calculation of Remittances as a Percentage of GDP

Step 1: Identify the given values.

  • Total Remittances = $36.1 billion
  • Gross Domestic Product (GDP) = $405 billion

Step 2: State the formula. Percentage of GDP = (Total Remittances / GDP) * 100

Step 3: Substitute the values into the formula and calculate. Percentage of GDP = ($36.1 billion / $405 billion) * 100 Percentage of GDP ≈ 0.0891 * 100

Step 4: State the final answer. Answer: Remittances constituted approximately 8.9% of the Philippines' GDP in 2022.

Part 2: Sociological Explanation

Positive Consequence: This significant inflow of foreign currency (8.9% of GDP) is a major macroeconomic stabiliser. At a micro level, these remittances directly increase household income, funding education, healthcare, and small business start-ups, thereby reducing poverty and improving living standards for many families.

Negative Consequence: A major negative consequence is the 'brain drain'. Many of these overseas Filipino workers are highly skilled professionals, such as nurses, engineers, and IT specialists. Their departure represents a significant loss of human capital for the Philippines, hindering the development of its own domestic industries and public services (e.g., healthcare system). This creates a dependency on remittances rather than fostering sustainable internal economic growth.