Exam tip 1
In essays, clearly define globalisation before explaining its impact on identity. Use the homogenisation vs. hybridity debate as a central framework for your argument, providing evidence for both sides.
9699 · 7.2
Common exam mistakes on 9699 Globalisation and identity. Learn what loses marks, then practise the topic with Examiner’s Ink.
In essays, clearly define globalisation before explaining its impact on identity. Use the homogenisation vs. hybridity debate as a central framework for your argument, providing evidence for both sides.
Use specific examples like the global spread of English, Hollywood films, or fast-food chains to illustrate cultural imperialism. However, be prepared to critique this view by considering how local cultures might resist or adapt these global products.
When discussing hybridity, use the concept of 'glocalisation' with specific examples. This demonstrates a nuanced understanding that goes beyond a simple 'for or against' globalisation argument.
Link this argument to political events such as the rise of nationalist movements or Brexit. This shows you can apply sociological theory to contemporary real-world examples of identity politics.
This is a common oversimplification of the cultural homogenisation thesis. While 'Americanisation' is a powerful force due to the USA's economic and media dominance, it is not the whole story. Sociologists also highlight cultural hybridity, where American culture is mixed with local traditions, and resistance, where local cultures are strengthened in opposition to global pressures. Globalisation is a complex, two-way process, not just a one-way imposition of American culture.
Most sociologists argue that national identity is not disappearing, but rather changing. While some argue it is weakened by global flows and allegiances (e.g., to global brands or online communities), others argue it is strengthened as a form of resistance to globalisation. It can also become more hybrid, incorporating global elements. Therefore, national identity remains a significant, though contested and evolving, source of identity in the global era.
No, while migrants are a classic example of individuals who negotiate hybrid identities (e.g., 'British-Asian'), the process is much broader. Anyone living in a globalised society is exposed to a wide range of cultural influences through media, travel, and the internet. A young person in any country might blend local musical tastes with global genres like K-Pop or Hip Hop, or combine local fashion with global brands, thereby creating a personal hybrid identity without ever leaving their home country.