Skip to content

9609 · 7.2.4

Barriers to communication — practice questions

Practice and worked examples for 9609 Barriers to communication. Short previews only — attempt the full question in MarkScheme against the official scheme.

Worked example 1

A global bank merges its UK and Asian operations. UK managers complain that Asian team members 'never say no' on video calls, leading to missed deadlines. Asian staff feel their UK colleagues are 'rude and too direct.' Identify the communication barriers and propose specific, justified solutions.

Show solution outline

Step 1: Identify and Explain the Barriers

  • Cultural Barrier: This is the primary issue. It stems from different communication styles. The UK team likely uses a low-context style (direct, explicit language), while the Asian team may use a high-context style where 'yes' can mean 'I understand what you are saying' rather than 'I agree and commit to this'. Saying 'no' directly can be seen as disrespectful in some high-context cultures.
  • Status Barrier: In a hierarchical culture, junior staff (potentially the Asian team members) may be reluctant to openly disagree with or challenge senior staff (the UK managers), especially in a public forum like a group video call.
  • Perceptual Barrier: The UK team perceives the lack of direct refusal as agreement, while the Asian team perceives the UK team's directness as rudeness. Both sides are filtering communication through their own cultural and psychological lenses.

Step 2: Analyse the Impact on the Business

  • Operational Inefficiency: Deadlines are missed because commitment was assumed but not secured.
  • Low Morale and Team Cohesion: Mutual frustration ('rude', 'unreliable') damages working relationships and trust.
  • Poor Decision-Making: Decisions are made based on flawed assumptions about agreement.

Step 3: Propose and Justify Solutions

  • Solution 1: Cross-Cultural Training. Justification: Conduct mandatory workshops for both teams to educate them on high-context vs. low-context communication, non-verbal cues, and cultural attitudes towards hierarchy. This builds awareness and empathy, reducing perceptual errors.
  • Solution 2: Implement a 'Decision Log'. Justification: After each meeting, the chair circulates a written summary of key decisions and action points, with assigned owners and deadlines. Team members must reply in writing (e.g., via email or a project management tool) to confirm their commitment. This bypasses the verbal ambiguity of 'yes' and creates a clear, documented record of agreement.
  • Solution 3: Rotate Meeting Times and Chairs. Justification: To overcome the time-zone and status barriers, meeting times should be rotated to be fair to all regions. Rotating the role of meeting chairperson can also empower different team members and encourage broader participation.

Worked example 2

A sales manager at 'Precision Parts Ltd' emails an urgent order for '1,000 units of the premium X-5 component' to the production supervisor. The supervisor, unfamiliar with the new 'premium' designation, assumes it refers to a cosmetic finish and produces 1,000 standard components with this finish. The actual premium component requires a different internal part. The error is discovered just before shipping. Calculate the total financial cost of this communication failure using the data below:

  • Standard component production cost: $50/unit
  • Premium component production cost: $75/unit
  • Rework cost to convert standard to premium: $30/unit
  • Late delivery penalty: 5% of total order value (120,000)120,000)
Show solution outline

Step 1: Identify the Communication Barriers

  • Semantic Barrier (Jargon): The term 'premium' was ambiguous and not formally defined for the production team.
  • Channel Barrier: Using an informal email for a critical production order was inappropriate. A formal, standardised order form with clear specifications should have been used.

Step 2: Calculate the Cost of the Incorrect Production Run The supervisor produced 1,000 units at the standard component cost. Initial Cost=1,000 units×$50/unit=$50,000\text{Initial Cost} = 1,000 \text{ units} \times \text{\textdollar}50/\text{unit} = \text{\textdollar}50,000

Step 3: Calculate the Rework Cost To fix the mistake, each of the 1,000 units needs to be reworked. Rework Cost=1,000 units×$30/unit=$30,000\text{Rework Cost} = 1,000 \text{ units} \times \text{\textdollar}30/\text{unit} = \text{\textdollar}30,000

Step 4: Calculate the Total Actual Production Cost This is the sum of the initial incorrect production and the rework cost. Total Actual Cost=$50,000+$30,000=$80,000\text{Total Actual Cost} = \text{\textdollar}50,000 + \text{\textdollar}30,000 = \text{\textdollar}80,000

Step 5: Calculate the Cost if Communication Had Been Effective The correct components would have been produced from the start. Correct Cost=1,000 units×$75/unit=$75,000\text{Correct Cost} = 1,000 \text{ units} \times \text{\textdollar}75/\text{unit} = \text{\textdollar}75,000

Step 6: Calculate the Direct Financial Loss from Production Error This is the difference between the actual cost and the correct cost. Production Loss=$80,000$75,000=$5,000\text{Production Loss} = \text{\textdollar}80,000 - \text{\textdollar}75,000 = \text{\textdollar}5,000

Step 7: Calculate the Late Delivery Penalty The penalty is 5% of the total order value of 120,000.120,000. Penalty Cost=0.05×$120,000=$6,000\text{Penalty Cost} = 0.05 \times \text{\textdollar}120,000 = \text{\textdollar}6,000

Step 8: Calculate the Total Financial Cost of the Communication Failure This is the sum of the production loss and the penalty cost. Total Financial Cost=Production Loss+Penalty Cost\text{Total Financial Cost} = \text{Production Loss} + \text{Penalty Cost}

Total Financial Cost=$5,000+$6,000=$11,000\text{Total Financial Cost} = \text{\textdollar}5,000 + \text{\textdollar}6,000 = \text{\textdollar}11,000 Final Answer: The total financial cost directly attributable to the communication failure is **11,000.11,000**.